APA hit with new torture allegations

first_img Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Email Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country Did the American Psychological Association (APA) collude with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to enable the torture of detainees in the War on Terror? The answer won’t be known until June, when an independent investigation is due to conclude. But at least one thing was made clear today in a report from an independent group of psychologists based on e-mail exchanges between APA and CIA officials from 2003 to 2006: The world’s largest professional organization for psychologists has maintained a surprisingly cozy relationship with the defense and intelligence community.Last year, James Risen, a reporter for The New York Times, alleged in his book Pay Any Price that APA worked closely with CIA and the White House to provide ethical justification for involving psychologists in harsh interrogations of detainees in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere. In 2003, those interrogations were revealed to involve degrading treatment and, at times, unambiguous torture. Risen claimed that APA worked closely with officials from CIA, the U.S. Department of Defense, and the White House to craft a 2005 report concluding that psychologists’ involvement with CIA interrogations was ethical. And he asserted that APA incorporated language provided by CIA directly into its ethical code, providing professional cover for psychologists involved with interrogations.Risen’s evidence is a cache of 683 e-mails provided to him by several activists and psychologists critical of APA’s involvement with the government. Until now, none of those e-mails were released publicly.center_img Last November, APA refuted the allegations but commissioned an independent investigation. That investigation, led by a former federal prosecutor, David Hoffman, was expected to wrap up in March but has been delayed until June.In an article published today, Risen uses a selection of 16 of the e-mails to delve deeper into APA’s alleged cooperation with CIA. Those e-mails and the report about them were also provided to ScienceInsider under embargo by Nathaniel Raymond, a human rights researcher at Harvard University. “The APA’s complicity in adapting its ethics to countenance psychologist involvement in researching and monitoring torture is the worst bioethics scandal of the 21st Century to date,” Raymond asserted in an e-mail.Some of the e-mails released today appear to contradict APA’s public statements about its relationship with CIA and the administration of former U.S. President George W. Bush. For example, in a 2005 e-mail to CIA officials regarding APA’s 2005 report on the ethics of interrogation, Geoff Mumford, then APA director of science policy, wrote:“I thought you and many of those copied here would be interested to know that APA grabbed the bull by the horns and released this [Psychological Ethics and National Security] Task Force Report today. … I also wanted to semi-publicly acknowledge your personal contribution … in getting this effort off the ground over a year ago. Your views were well represented by very carefully selected Task Force members.”One recipient of that e-mail was Kirk Hubbard, a former CIA behavioral scientist then was employed by Mitchell Jessen and Associates, the government contracting company created by James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen, the architects of CIA’s interrogation program.Jean Maria Arrigo, a practicing psychologist based in Riverside, California, who reviewed the report, believes e-mail exchanges like that one constitute collusion between APA and CIA. “There are people in APA leadership being scripted by CIA, maybe even paid,” she alleges.APA declined to comment on the new allegations, pending the outcome of the Hoffman investigation. In an e-mail exchange with ScienceInsider, the association wrote:”Mr. Hoffman has extensive experience in conducting such reviews and a strong reputation for independence. … Mr. Hoffman has been asked to follow all leads and pursue all information he deems necessary to complete the review regardless of whether the information reflects positively or negatively on APA.” Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*)last_img